Chris, I can tune in to that wave length but isn't the cattle call equally demeaning? 30 seconds and "Next!" The only difference is this one is televised as entertainment AND the network is not only housing, but feeding and watering those jokers for the duration as well! It's a rock music show and I'm a rock musician and for the price of turning on my TV I can be entertained for a few minutes.
No sin, no stigma, no sickness.
Many bands have replaced a bandmember and ascended to higher levels of fame. AC/DC had great success with a replacement singer who wasn't half the vocalist their original was.
INXS is the topic however and Michael Hutchence was a brilliant singer who made understated whispered vocals his purview instead of bellowing them out like every other rocker on the seven continents. Forensics ruled his November 1997 death a suicide, not auto-erotic asphyxiation. Hutchence took Prozac for the last two years of his life and was depressed over an upcoming custody battle. An analysis report of the deceased's blood indicated the presence of alcohol, cocaine, Prozac and other prescription drugs.
Death before one's time, especially with all the grimy details in bold type in Rolling Stone, is always tragic.
It's tough to fault INXS (or Dave Navarro) for taking television up on the comeback idea. CBS approached them with checkbook in hand, not the other way around. INXS, Dave and CBS are bound to make huge dividends whether a comeback is successful or not.
Furthermore the respect attendant with being on a weekly TV series with its rewards of sex and money and reinvigorated fame would be extremely difficult for any rational unemployed musician to turn down.
In light of those facts I wouldn't want to be the one to cast the first stone.
I'm voting for Heather. [img]graemlins/thumbs_up.gif[/img] I have a softness (actually quite the opposite) for redheaded grrlz. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
<font color="#a62a2a" size="1">[ July 17, 2005 11:44 AM: Message edited by: Five Eight ]</font>
Bookmarks